Christopher Posted October 29, 2010 Posted October 29, 2010 (Reuters) - A leading U.S. maker of electronic cigarettes has agreed not to target its sales and advertisements to minors or to claim its products are safe alternatives to tobacco, under a consent judgment reached with California. The settlement, announced on http://in.reuters.com/article/idINTRE69S5CH20101029
Shihzam Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Most of that sounds OK with a couple exceptions. The part not advertising as a "safe" alternative to smoking and purchaser must produce a goverment issued ID????? Hows that going to work over the internet? Still could be a positive step?
snubber Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Sounds like they're starting to cave under the pressure. And why can't you say no second hand "smoke" and no tobacco if there isn't any???
Lily Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 This is just the beginning of adding more and more restrictions on e-cigarettes. I wonder if there are any studies or polls on how many underage persons smoke analogs? DAYVAPE 1
mastiffmom Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 This is just the beginning of adding more and more restrictions on e-cigarettes. I wonder if there are any studies or polls on how many underage persons smoke analogs? Since analogs are cheaper for underagers and easier to hide from parents I would have to say the numbers will be much higher for the under aged set.
Lily Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Hi, I meant more of how absolutely idiotic for the people in power to target this aspect of e-cigs, that children are going to get hold of them, when analogs are there for their taking. It's a mind game!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now