Christopher Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Judge upholds that FDA can regulate e-cigarettes A federal district judge in Washington Friday upheld the Food and Drug Administration’s decision to regulate electronic cigarettes and cigars like conventional cigarettes. In a 93-page decision, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson rejected arguments by Nicopure Labs, LLC, a Florida manufacturer of liquids used in e-cigarettes, and the Right to be Smoke-Free Coalition, which includes the American Vaping Association, e-cigarette companies and state trade groups. They had contended that the FDA, in deciding to regulate e-cigarettes and related products, exceeded its authority and violated the Administrative Procedure Act. But Jackson concluded that “the agency acted within the scope of its statutory authority.” Under the FDA rule, she noted, “manufacturers of e-cigarettes are now required to tell the 30 million people who use the devices what is actually in the liquid being vaporized and inhaled.” The fight over what’s known as the FDA “deeming rule” is far from over. Another half-dozen lawsuits are pending. Source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FXRich Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 I wonder if it will ever get to SCOTUS, their word will be final, no appeals from there, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 2 hours ago, Christopher said: U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson rej That one is a government rubber stamp. She has quite the history. They knew the decision when the case was assigned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tam Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Just when we thought we were seeing light at the end of the tunnel, someone decided to add on to the tunnel to make it a little longer. Well, that just means we have more work to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earthling789 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 4 hours ago, Walt said: That one is a government rubber stamp. She has quite the history. They knew the decision when the case was assigned. I agree... That judge has a reputation for siding with gov't over-reach and big corp lobby... She makes the Ninth Circus Court look sane in many of her decisions :( Walt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now