BirdDog Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 It is nice to read an article that is not one-sided. New link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schizophretard Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Our side could of been a little better though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmokinHammer Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 It is nice to read something that's not completely one sided, but it continues to amaze me that, in a country where the norm is to consider any criminal "innocent until presumed guilty," a device like an e-cig can be considered dangerous until proven safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddavelarsen Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 The comments are very good however; many well-informed and articulate vapers made excellent statements to counter the dimwit public mouthpiece. The downside of course, is that many of the article's readers might not read the comments. Let's hope that just one smoker does, and finds his(her) way here. Vape on! Thanks Bird Dog, great find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keenan Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 I just read a couple of the comments ( and posted my own ) and it looked like there WERE a couple of people interested in getting thier own device. Great article BirdDog ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeRo9k Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 It was a good article. It seems most comments are siding with the e-cig. Keenan I think I found you post, you used a lot of caps : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nana Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 It was a good article. The comments in it about the FDA were stupid. But I liked the responses about the FDA. Most of those people sounded articulate and well informed - including our very own Keenan. A lot of the points that were made were right on. Good find! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyVape Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 That was a good read. I really enjoyed reading the commits. So, I had to add my own. Extra thanks to 'RooksGambit' for covering the "fallacy or two from the pro side of this article". I would not have done as well. When asking permission to vape in a non-smokers house, I always tell them that I may be exhaling a small amount of nic IMHO. Note: I have learned not to blow out a big mouthful of vapor, at those times. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzeisman Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 "The devices are used to vaporize e-liquid, consisting of nicotine, flavor and other chemicals such as the solvent propylene glycol, contained in e-cigarette cartridges for inhalation by the user." its a solvent?!? i thought it was a food additive?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveD1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 definitions of a Solvent: substance that dissolves things: a substance in which other substances are dissolved, often a liquid dissolves or can dissolve <solvent action of water Capable of dissolving another substance. A substance in which another substance is dissolved, forming a solution. A substance, usually a liquid, capable of dissolving another substance. E-juice or E-Liquid is definitly a solution of many different ingredients. But it does sound like they are trying to compare it with words that are scare tactics!!!! I havent read one post yet where E-Cigs where a problem for anyone yet except a alergy to PG which is replaceable with pure VG instead. Just my 2cents... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyVape Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I haven't read one post yet where E-Cigs where a problem Amen to that! It would only take one severe problem to wipe us off the map. Big thanks to all that came before us, for not screwing it up. -- Stay vigilant. From the GreenSmoke comments, I can see why suppliers are not trusted. I decided not to refute Fred, but someone needs to. -- Thanks. note: by clicking their links, you are making them money. -- just saying... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now