Jump to content

Yet Another Reason To Kick Em All Out Of Office


Recommended Posts

I would say whatever tattoo one gets, goes to character. Therefore whatever tats he has SHOULD prejudice the jury. Sadly they will try to make sure the jury never knows this guy has a swastika on his neck and barbed wire on his face, or the fact that he has already tried to break out of prison. To me, any actions by a defendant while in jail after a crime, should be admitted as evidence to show a jury who they may set free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say whatever tattoo one gets, goes to character. Therefore whatever tats he has SHOULD prejudice the jury. Sadly they will try to make sure the jury never knows this guy has a swastika on his neck and barbed wire on his face, or the fact that he has already tried to break out of prison. To me, any actions by a defendant while in jail after a crime, should be admitted as evidence to show a jury who they may set free.

I'm sure you know, Travis, that the problem with common sense (like this) is... it's not common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on,just because he has a swasticka on one side of his neck and F___ You on the other doesn't mean he's a bad guy! They they got this guy good if that's what it takes to get him the needle,I say go for it. 1 less appeal in the future,the make up artist is cheaper in the long run.

This is why I could never be a cop,I would of shot him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines