crackrat Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 Hey, everyone, first post here so sorry if I screw things up or don't follow protocol. Just a quick question: Does anyone prefer a wickless clearomizer over one with a wick? Why? Why not? Thanks in advance....and great forum you have here. I just spent an hour getting up to speed. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimJongUn Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 I prefer the ones with a wick. They seem to be better made and last longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tam Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 Not sure if the bottom feeders like the Pro Tank and the Vision Nano have small hidden wicks but these seem to have less flavor muting than the ones with wicks. I think it's all a matter of personal preference myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffb Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 I concur with Mr Un Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcquinn Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 (edited) I would think given the way these things work unless you lower the resistance and or jack up the voltage you would get better vapor with a wick to meter the liquid to the element . Flooded elements just cannot get hot enough to make vapor under normal conditions. Edited June 11, 2013 by mcquinn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now