Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/13/2017 in all areas

  1. I just received a Templar AIO kit by Vapor Talk in the mail yesterday. Since setting it up I have been vaping on it exclusively. Here are my first impressions. Packaging: Very nice box art. It is definitely representative of the Vapor Talk brand. If I hadn’t already seen photos of the device I would have been tearing into the box in anticipation of checking out the contents. Instead, I tore into the box in anticipation of actually getting my hands on what was inside. The contents: It’s no frills. You get the mod, 2 coils, the standard USB charging cable and a manual that is easier to understand than most I have seen. The mod: Very simple to set up and operate. The hinged cover for the charging port (located on the bottom of the device) easily swings out of the way and has a magnet to keep it in place when the cover is in the ‘closed’ position. The top comes off easily, even with the child proof design. I had no trouble screwing a coil on and filling the reservoir/tank couldn’t have been simpler. The appearance is sleek, fits well in my hand and appears to be constructed well. There do appear to be a couple of minor differences and/or omissions between the manual and the device. The manual says the charging light will flash 4 times to indicate a successful connection. I connected the device to 6 different ports with two different charging cables and each time I got a solid red light. This was after the initial “charging” because the fact the light didn’t flash 4 times was actually brought to my attention after the fact. The device also must have been mostly charged because the charging light went from red to green in a matter of minutes. The other omission I noticed from the manual is the battery mAh rating. It isn’t listed in the manual but is listed on the VT website – 1000 mAh. Operation: Charge it, 5 clicks to turn on, press the fire button, inhale and enjoy. It doesn’t get much simpler than that. Experience: Overall it will serve as a very capable backup for me. I have been using it exclusively for close to 24 hours as of this writing and other than the fact that I might need to step up the nicotine it has served its purpose. I normally vape 3mg between .1 and .2 ohms, so going to .5 ohm just isn’t giving me the same “hit” I’m used to. I have done everything from short 1-2 second drags to longer 8-10 second drags. Casual hits every few minutes to chain vaping. The tank does get warm when chain vaping. I will admit that I was actually hoping it would serve as a nice little stealth vaping device, but with .5 ohm coils and the way I do DTL hits, that just isn’t going to happen for me. It might be a little stealthier if I up my PG, as the juice I have in it right now is a 10/90 PG/VG ratio, but even if I switch to a 50/50 or even a 60/40 I think I’m going to be producing quite a bit of vapor simply based on the way I vape. The airflow does not appear to be adjustable. That’s fine and doesn’t take away from the operation of the device; it’s just tighter than my personal preference. Appears to vaporize the liquid and utilize the battery very efficiently. I am still on the original 2ml of liquid I put in the tank, though I’m definitely getting toward the bottom end of that. By comparison, I would have easily gone through 6-9ml of liquid with one of my normal setups with the amount of vaping I have done and I would have easily drained 2 2500 mAh batteries, though I have no idea how close to drained the battery is. At 1000 mAh I would have though I'd have had to charge it a couple of times by now, but I'm still on the original charge.
    2 points
  2. ....and it tastes pretty good! Accidently put the wrong juice in the wrong tank And it's a winner! Lol Love happy accidents.
    2 points
  3. I'm taking the survey now. Funny thing about all the pictures...none of them has created an craving, urge, desire or need to vape, but some of them have caused a craving for red vines, created an urge to use a pencil to write this response by hand and an inexplicable desire to pick my nose.
    2 points
  4. This article is from way before ecigs were around. I'm not sure if posting a link is allowed and my apologies if they aren't. Im not bashing ecigs, they helped me quit smoking. I was just oblivious to what PG was and never really researched it. It's pretty toxic stuff though, but so are cigarettes and the polluted air we are constantly exposed to. I don't know of any studies to prove anything indicating the effects but I just wonder I how it couldn't be harmful. Thanks for your insight... https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=1120&tid=240.
    1 point
  5. Yeah, and I think I did the drop all in about a year. I dropped pretty fast down to 6 and hung out there the longest then inmediately went to 3 when subohming came in. Couldn't be happier.
    1 point
  6. Been hitting this for a few hrs now other than the red light green light issues I mentioned earlier Im diggin it for its size its feels great in the hand and the flavor from my DIY juice is amazing
    1 point
  7. Walt

    My First Homemade Clapton

    24SS wrapped in 32SS Used the Avid Artisan winding tool. As you can see it had a blip. The rest looks pretty good as far as I can tell.
    1 point
  8. ROFLMAO! That's hilarious! And absolutely appropriate cravings considering the content! I will admit tho, that seeing someone blowing a cloud from a mod did increase my desire to want to take a hit. Anything else either made me hungry or disgusted (cheapy cig-alikes), or didn't do much of anything at all for me.
    1 point
  9. It's research man, nothing inherently nefarious about research. Research itself is a good thing. We can learn from it. I took the survey, I'm sure they'll see a pattern in my responses.
    1 point
  10. That's brilliant! Their mostly home brew so I can "suck it up" until I get to half bottle point and brew up a half batch of zero. You just rescued about 500ml of juice!!!! Now I'm excited! Can't wait to see what they taste like at 3mg. Gotta to be better.
    1 point
  11. Ok, well, it looks pretty. but.... I went to wind it on a post and it is loose. Real loose. So, I did a second one. Better... Still ended up with a few mm of loose coil a the end after winding. Up side, I put a build in a Goon @ 0.17Ω and @ 110 Watts it is producing well. Improvements can be made with this process. I will try again later.
    1 point
  12. Walt

    My First Homemade Clapton

    A little cleaner shot
    1 point
  13. Honestly, if you shop around, wire is cheap. There's really no reason to go a year with a set of coils. I'm probably in the minority when it comes to how frequently I change the coils in my RDA's - every time I change the wick. But building coils is something I enjoy. Sometimes I get a day, sometimes I get a week. It depends on what type of juice I'm vaping and it depends on whether I'm testing multiple flavors when it comes down to how frequently I make the decision to change the coils.
    1 point
  14. Just got this in from VT - The Templar AIO kit (along with a sampler of VT Black Label Crown Jewels). Thanks to @Christopher!! Charged up. Filled up. Being vaped as I write this. First impressions to come later this weekend.
    1 point
  15. 1 point
  16. X2 on Bavarian cream When I mix I use flavors I know I like so if it doesent come out perfect I know its still vapeable
    1 point
  17. Adulting sucks. :(
    1 point
  18. Thanks, everyone! @Bebop you weren't too far behind me when you came on. I'm glad you came to VT -- and stayed, this place wouldn't be the same without you and your wit and knowledge that you pass to new and experienced vapers alike. @Edna, you've been a very welcome addition and a very quick learner! I look forward to seeing your first year vaperversary soon. @Earthling789, you know... I might actually have some old CE4s in my stash o'stuff. Might need to take a look one of these days and go through all that to see what gets unearthed. Sort of like a vaping time capsule, lol. Thanks for sticking around and being such a valuable resource to old and new vapers. @Walt, this place is special because we have members like you so come, ask questions, listen to the answers given, and then pass that along to new people coming in. I'm looking forward to seeing you around for years to come!
    1 point
  19. I read this in a blog called Vaping Post this morning. Thought it quite interesting seeing that it was done in the good ole USA. (I wanted to copy/paste the link and my computer wouldn't cooperate.) Air Sampling confirms secondhand vapor is harmless Results obtained from an air sample of a small non-ventilated vape shop, clearly indicate that the amount of toxic substances present in the air where a lot of vaping is taking place, are of insignificant levels. The California Department of Public Health has been carrying out air sampling in vape shops throughout the state, as part of its initiative to determine the health effects of second-hand vapor exposure. Earlier today in his blog, Public Health Expert Dr. Michael Siegel pointed out that the results for this report were obtained from a relatively small and non-ventilated vape shop, where many of the employees and 13 customers were actively vaping while the sampling was taking place, hence what would be considered a situation presenting a high level of exposure to second-hand vapor. However, given all these unfavourable conditions, the results still reported no dangerous levels of exposure to any hazardous chemicals. The main results of the air sampling go as follows : Nicotine: Not detected Glycidol: Not detected Formaldehyde: 7.2 ppb Diacetyl: Not detected using standard method 2,3-Pentanedione: Not detected using standard method Acetyl butyryl: Not detected using standard method Acetoin: Not detected using standard method Acetone: Not detected Ethyl benzene: Not detected m,p-Xylene: Not detected o-Xylene: Not detected Toluene: Not detected Acetaldehyde: Not detected Acetonitrile: Not detected alpha-pinene: Not detected Benzene: Not detected Chloroform: Not detected d-Limonene: Not detected Methylene chloride: Not detected Methyl methacrylate: Not detected n-Hexane: Not detected Styrene: Not detected Finally putting fears about formaldehyde to rest? Dr. Siegel pointed out that the level of formaldehyde detected, is consistent with the levels normally found in indoor and outdoor air levels under baseline conditions, adding that the only other chemicals detected were ethanol (alcohol) and isopropyl alcohol. “This study, although conducted under very high exposure conditions in a small, non-ventilated vape shop with many employees and customers vaping and clouds of vapor visible, did not document any dangerous levels of exposure to any hazardous chemical. Nicotine exposure was essentially non-existent. Formaldehyde exposure was no different than in many indoor and outdoor environments at baseline. Acetone, acetoin, other aldehydes, toluene, benzene, and xylene were not detected. Chemicals that have been associated with “popcorn lung” were also not detected by the standard method.” stated Siegel. No justification for governments to ban vaping “This study adds to the evidence that under real-life conditions, ‘secondhand vaping’ does not appear to pose any significant health risks.” concluded the public health expert. He added that whilst he himself has been behind many of the smoking bans that took place, based on this current evidence he fails to see a reason as to why governments should ban vaping in public spaces. “With regards to vaping, I just don’t see any reasonable evidence at this time that it poses any significant health hazard to bystanders.”
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines