Leaderboard

sigh* a subtank nano.I'm done with tanks now,I've gone a bit tank crazy lately,but it's a relief I won't need another one for a very long time.I've got low wattage mid wattage , to high wattage capable tanks.sub ohm and non sub ohm.I think I'm good for a good while,my next move will be mods and batteries;)

Oh man. Don't let some numbnut in a B & M discourage you. We can set you up with a simple device that can at least get you started on the road out of cigarette hell. It doesn't have to be that difficult.

I had no idea. Ok, now I need to build an addition on the house to house all of this stuff.

Yes. I think you'll probably get more answers if you ask this on its own thread instead of this one.

haha!I'm eyeballing single battery mods for now,looking at the aspire pegasus,eleaf aster,and Pico 75 watt.any thoughts y'all ?

I have to laugh. I get it. These devices are captivating. I've been eying the Lost Vape Therion DNA75. You know, for those black tie affairs. Nice leather wrap with ebony accents. Oh my! Then of course, I would have to get a Rolex, new tux, and Salavtore Ferragamo shoes to go with it. Then the venue wouldn't allow vaping anyway. Hmmmmm. I think I'll just get a different flavor of juice to try instead.

Definitely not good. If your running 3.7V @ .25ohms that's a draw of 14.7 amps. The battery would try to provide the current an be stressed way past max limit. The results could be really nasty. That's only 54 Watts. Sent from my iPad using The Vapor Talk mobile app

Out with old and in with the new.!................socks... Yeah I got new socks. BIG changes this year. BIG Happy new year everybody!

I don't know what kind of study you're doing, and I'm not clicking the link to find out about a few subjective or bias questions which will likely lead to zero conclusions (other than "vaping is bad", which is the go-to for the medical/dental community). As a former researcher, I can tell you the only honest study you can do, will take at least 500 test subjects and 10-20 years to conduct properly. You'll need 100 each of non-smokers/non-vapers for control group...100 each current smokers, former smokers who don't vape or use any other nicotine diversion, former smokers who vape, and non-smokers who vape. You'll have to also eliminate/mitigate environmental factors, excessive drinkers, caffeine addicts, and those who consume sugar (drinks/candy), or any other known oral-health damage causing factors. I'd wish you luck on your endeavor, but we both know you're probably not going to be investigating this thoroughly (long-term) or seriously... because next semester you'll have a new pet-project to complete for your indoctrination officials (a.k.a professors)... rather than learning real dentistry.... Sorry for the cynicism, but I've been around long enough in the medical field to know smoke-and-mirrors faux-research attempts when I see it....